|
TLDR
|
The Two Extremes That Don’t Work
You’ve probably had this exact conversation with yourself more than once. Say something and risk the awkward confrontation, or stay quiet and let the resentment build for another quarter. Most people default to the second option, because it feels safer in the moment. It rarely is.
Most advice about difficult work relationships lands on one of two extremes. Either grin and bear it, absorbing whatever the dynamic keeps costing you, or cut the person off completely, treating every conflict like it requires a clean break.
Neither one actually solves the underlying problem. Staying silent doesn’t make the frustration disappear, it just moves it underground, where it shows up later as disengagement, resentment, or a sudden resignation that seems to come out of nowhere to everyone except the person who left. Going straight to a hard cutoff, on the other hand, tends to be reserved for situations that actually call for it, like abuse or safety concerns. For everything short of that, cutting someone off over a frustrating meeting habit usually costs more than it solves.
There’s a third option, and it’s the one that actually works in most day-to-day situations: state the need clearly, without the blame, and let the other person’s response tell you what happens next.
The Real Difference Between Blame and a Clear Need
The words you choose matter more than the intensity of how you feel. There’s a real difference between “you always talk over me and ignore my input in meetings” and “moving forward, I need to share my full thoughts in our strategy meetings before we move on.”
The first version, even if every word is true, puts the other person immediately on defense. Once someone feels attacked, their focus shifts to justifying themselves rather than actually hearing what you need. The second version skips that entirely. It’s specific, it’s forward-looking, and it gives the other person something concrete to act on instead of something to defend against.
This distinction sounds small, but it changes almost every outcome that follows. A clear, blame-free request is far more likely to actually get met, because it doesn’t require the other person to admit fault first.
What Happens After You State the Need
Once you’ve said it clearly, your job shifts. You’re no longer responsible for how the other person reacts, only for how clearly you communicated the need in the first place.
If the response is defensive, resist the pull to justify yourself further or launch into a counter-argument. Your job at that point is to listen, ask for clarity if needed, and determine whether the other person is actually willing to meet the need you laid out. You’re not negotiating your right to ask. You’re finding out whether this is a relationship worth continuing to invest in at the current level.
The Radius Shift: Adjusting Access Without a Blow-Up
If you’ve stated a reasonable need clearly and the other person explicitly refuses to respect it, you don’t need to escalate into a confrontation to protect yourself. You simply adjust their access.
Think of it as circles of access rather than an all-or-nothing decision. Someone who consistently respects your time and boundaries stays close, with real access to your energy and attention. Someone who doesn’t gets moved outward. That might mean shorter calls, communication limited to email instead of impromptu conversations, or declining to take on extra work that isn’t part of your actual role with them.
This isn’t punishment, and it doesn’t require an announcement. It’s simply a recalibration of how much of yourself a given relationship gets to draw on, based on how that person has actually shown up.
Why This Shows Up on HR’s Desk Eventually
This is often the piece that HR teams miss when a strong performer starts pulling back or a previously engaged employee goes quiet. The instinct is to look for a skills gap or a motivation problem. Usually, it isn’t either. It’s an unaddressed boundary issue that’s been building for months, sometimes years, until the person simply stops trying to fix it themselves.
By the time it reaches HR, the employee has often already mentally checked out, even while still hitting every deadline on paper. Catching this earlier, before it turns into quiet disengagement or sudden turnover, requires giving people the actual language and process for setting boundaries before they’ve reached their limit.
Building the Skill Before You Need It
The good news is that this is a learnable skill, not a personality trait some people have and others don’t. It takes identifying the relationship that’s currently draining you, defining the specific need in one clear sentence, and practicing how to say it before you’re in the room having to say it under pressure.
Once you’ve done it a few times, it stops feeling like confrontation and starts feeling like clarity. And clarity, more often than people expect, is what actually protects a relationship instead of ending one.
Susan Shirley coaches executives, teams, and HR leaders through exactly this kind of boundary work, before it turns into disengagement or turnover. Book a complimentary session to map out where it’s costing you.
Ready to Move the Dial in Your Life or Business?
Book a complimentary coaching session with Susan Shirley and start working through what’s actually keeping you stuck.
